Two Canadian Reviews Echo the Cass Review- No Evidence for Pushing Puberty Blockers and Synthetic Sex Hormones

Researchers out of Hamilton, Ontario's McMaster University and The Society for Evidence Based Medicine (SEGM) used a systematic review method called "meta-analysis" to assess a host of existing studies, which once again showed that there is poor evidence for the use of both GnRH Analogues (puberty blockers) and synthetic sex hormones for young people experiencing transgender ideation, commonly referred to as gender dysphoria (GD).

Our Duty Canada’s Official Letter re: The Cass Review

How the Cass Review Affects Gender Affirming Care in Canada

An Open Letter Urging Immediate Disengagement from the Discredited WPATH

We have sent our open letter (with over 250 signatures) urging disengagement from the discredited WPATH to over 750 medical, mental health, education and political bodies across Canada.

Our Duty Canada’s Universal Periodic Review Submission to be read in Geneva

Our submission outlining the lack of safety and efficacy within Canada’s mandated Gender Affirming Care model will be read in Geneva on Friday, November 10th. In April of this year, Our Duty Canada wrote a submission for the United Nations Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process that occurs every 4.5 years for each of the UN’s … Continue reading Our Duty Canada’s Universal Periodic Review Submission to be read in Geneva